Friday, September 03, 2004

Republicans: All Class

(AP) - President Bush on Friday wished Bill Clinton "best wishes for a swift and speedy recovery."

"He's is in our thoughts and prayers," Bush said at a campaign rally.

Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wis., booed. Bush did nothing to stop them.

Can anyone doubt that Kerry would have scolded those who behaved so crassly?

[Belated Update] This story has been retracted by the AP. Apparently it was a case of one reporter's misapprehension of what happened. My apologies for passing on bad information.

All the glory to me. All the blame to you.

Back in 2000, Gore failed to emphasize the good things the Clinton administration had done for the country while Bush managed to make it sound like it was Republicans who deserved all the credit. In other words, Bush ran as if he were the incumbent and Gore were the challenger.

In 2004 when, when everything is going to crap, he is running as if Kerry is the incumbent and Bush is the challenger.

Who bought Lyndie England's leash?

If Abu Ghraib was nothing more than the aberrant actions of a few rogue soldiers, than who bought the leash that was attached to that groveling Iraqi?

Wednesday, September 01, 2004

Seer, Sage, Soothsayer

A week ago I predicted it.

Now it has come true.

Bow down before my mighty powers! Bwahahaha!

Can I get an 'Amen'?

Brother Marshal gives us the word:

Again, this is not a Pollyannaish post. The Kerry campaign needs to get control of the debate back from the president. And they need to start hitting much harder. But Democrats themselves need to be a lot tougher and hardier about the cycles campaigns go through. And that applies to self-serving Democratic 'insiders' too.

Josh is right that one of the most annoying weaknesses of the Democrats is their habit of going into full panic mode whenever things start to look a little bad. This latest round of white-knuckling didn't start with the Swift Boat ads. It started with the release of an LA Times poll that showed a slight shift towards Bush. The Democrats, looking for a sign that the Swift Boat ads were hurting Kerry, latched onto this result as if it fully vindicated their fears.

But the polls over the course of this general election seasons have shown similar fluctuations, sometimes of even greater degree, in both Kerry's and Bush's favor, and on multiple occasions. There was nothing in that LA Times poll that justified the kind of full blown panic that it produced within Democratic circles.

Let's be clear about something: when it comes to policy the Democrats and the American people are in remarkable sync and the Republicans are way outside of the mainstream. But when it comes to message discipline the Republicans leave the Democrats in the dust. It's not the content of the message that matters in politics as much as the attitude behind it.

The Republicans are resolute in their message presentation while the Democrats are constantly second guessing themselves. When things start going bad for Republicans (and the last two years have been very bad for Republicans), it is rare for you to hear comments from anonymous Republicans about how their leadership is doing it wrong. But there is no shortage of fretting Democrats for reporters to quote, even when things are going well.

This is the reason why Democrats lose. The American people pick up on that lack of self-confidence. Even though they don't agree with the Republican policy, they still give them the power. Why? Because they don't want to give it to a bunch of wimps.

And yes, I am aware that this post might qualify as yet another example of self-critical Democratic white-knuckling. It's just one of those ironies that I have to criticize Democrats in order to get them to stop criticizing themselves. Have some confidence people! Your on the right side! Your on the side of the American people! They want to vote for you! They just need the confidence to feel that doing so is the right course of action. Squealing in fright at every shift in the polls isn't helping.

Tuesday, August 31, 2004

Turnabout?

Some tried to excuse the Swifties' attacks on Kerry as justified since Kerry made his service in Vietnam such a major part of the Democratic National Convention.

Well, the Republicans are now making a big deal about Bush's leadership and courage after 9/11. Does that mean that "scurillous" and "mean-spirited" attacks on those characteristics are now fair game?

William Saletan takes a crack at it.

For the past month, a group of veterans funded by a Bush campaign contributor and advised by a Bush campaign lawyer has attacked the story of John Kerry's heroism in Vietnam. They have argued, contrary to all known contemporaneous records, that Kerry was too brutal in a counterattack that earned him the Silver Star, and that he survived only mines, not bullets, when he rescued a fellow serviceman from a river. President Bush, who joined the National Guard as a young man to avoid Vietnam, has been challenged to denounce the group's charges. He has refused.

Now the Republican National Convention is showcasing Bush's own heroic moment. As John McCain put it last night: "I knew my confidence was well placed when I watched him stand on the rubble of the World Trade Center with his arm around a hero of September 11 and, in our moment of mourning and anger, strengthen our unity and our resolve by promising to right this terrible wrong and to stand up and fight for the values we hold dear."

Pardon me for asking, but where exactly is the heroism in this story? Where, indeed, is the heroism in anything Bush has done before 9/11 or since?